Is it teething time for your little one?

The Supreme Court today ruled that only the birth mother – not the genetic mother – should be on a child’s birth certificate.


The court found in favour of the State’s challenge to a landmark ruling last year, that held that genetics can be used to determine maternity.


The initial action was brought by a genetic mother of twins, whose sister gave birth to the children via surrogacy.


The woman was seeking to be named as the mother on her children’s birth certificate, bringing the challenge against the State over its insistence that only the woman who gives birth to the child can be officially acknowledged as the mother in the document.



Both the genetic mother and the woman who gave birth to the children had given their consent for the former to be stated as the mother on the birth certificate.


In today’s case, the State sought to appeal last year’s landmark ruling by the High Court that held that genetics can be used to determine maternity in the same way as it can paternity. 



Hello Mama!
Help us help you by allowing us and our partners to remember your device as having browsed MummyPages and serve you better content and ads

We're on a mission to help our mums and their families thrive by informing, connecting and entertaining.

Join us in our mission by consenting to the use of cookies and IP address recognition by us and our partners to serve you content (including ads) best suited to your interests, both here and around the web.

We promise never to share any other information that may be deemed personal unless you explicitly tell us it's ok.

If you want more info, see our privacy policy.