Is it teething time for your little one?

Yesterday, we reported on how a court in Australia had banned a mum from breastfeeding her child, all because she had gone under the needle to get a tattoo.


While medical records presented in court showed that the mother had tested negative for HIV and hepatitis, Judge Matthew Myers made the ruling based on the belief that there was an “unacceptable risk” of harm posed to the child.


In a dramatic series of events however, a Family Court today overturned the ruling. The injunction was unanimously thrown out after it emerged that the presiding judge had disregarded the opinions of medical experts.


In a rather disconcerting revelation, it has been reported that Judge Matthews made his decision on the basis of internet research which was at odds with the experts’ testimonies.


According to reports, Judge Matthews based his decision on information he had gathered from the Australian Breastfeeding Association’s website, which warns that tattoos increase the risk of developing a life-threatening disease, which can then be transferred through breast milk.


Commenting on the decision to overturn yesterday’s ruling, Judge Murray Aldridge said: “Judges must not mistake their own views for being either facts not reasonably open to question or as appropriately qualified evidence.”




Hello Mama!
Help us help you by allowing us and our partners to remember your device as having browsed MummyPages and serve you better content and ads

We're on a mission to help our mums and their families thrive by informing, connecting and entertaining.

Join us in our mission by consenting to the use of cookies and IP address recognition by us and our partners to serve you content (including ads) best suited to your interests, both here and around the web.

We promise never to share any other information that may be deemed personal unless you explicitly tell us it's ok.

If you want more info, see our privacy policy.